Discussion in 'news' started by Mars, 10 Jun 2011.
You have admitted that that is what you do though, while offering an explanation to describe what your work entails. You know, to check a company's security for holes.
Hardly something a lawyer would be able to defend against.
What is the name of your Professional Association again? Is it a self-regulatory body? Is your Code of Ethics publishable or are they supersekret?
It's called Sufing Dogs. Can you do this?
we get no love.
I don't think now is the time that she should posting specific details of her professional or personal life. The woman's safety is more important than forum curiosity or lulz.
lots of silly things being said over the road.
today theres nothing more that i would have liked to see than lecktor getting an email like this. i can only image the collective uproar
Mulch was good enough to bring the lulz to them. They aren't being very appreciative of the level of entertainment being shared with them.
You're joking, right?
Nope. She's just being herself. The joke is just part of the package.
There is more hostility and name calling than lulz-worthy brevity coming from them over there.
Lourdes character witness post was one of the only funnies there.
This isn't an opportunity to lob tired old insults at ex-SCII posters. It's an opportunity for some epic lulz.
They best start delivering. Why should we do all of the work while they reap all of the benefits?
Nina tried to explain that the personal attacks don't belong in this section of the forum.
Self control wad.
You are STILL joking!
No possible, jokes are prohibited in this forum!
We are gonna take back our title of the forum's token stoned chicks, one prank call and vent drive-by at a time! :highfive:
That surfing dogs video fucking pwns, Tarzan. Thanks!
I thought this was a joke-free node. No?